Wikiadmin at 20:30, 13 May 2020

2020-05-13T20:30:34Z

Wikiadmin: Created page with "{{Gotoparent|Software}} ICE's proprietary file system, IceFS, was developed to exceed demanding data acquisition rates. Traditional file systems such as EXT and FAT did not me..."

2020-04-14T14:59:39Z

Created page with "{{Gotoparent|Software}} ICE's proprietary file system, IceFS, was developed to exceed demanding data acquisition rates. Traditional file systems such as EXT and FAT did not me..."

New page

{{Gotoparent|Software}}
ICE's proprietary file system, IceFS, was developed to exceed demanding data acquisition rates. Traditional file systems such as EXT and FAT did not meet our throughput requirements. IceFS achieves near theoretical performance while minimizing the number of write cycles.

== Benchmark Results ==

=== 4U Server ===
Tested with 20 Savvio 10k.5 Spinning Drives

'''Read (10 reads, 4 threads, 100GB size)'''
Inner Cylinders: 145.13 MB/s per disk (2902 MB/s total)
Outer Cylinders: 80.49 MB/s per disk (1609 MB/s total)
'''Write (10 writes, 4 threads, 100GB size)'''
Inner Cylinders: 167.10 MB/s per disk (3342 MB/s total)
Outer Cylinders: 89.11 MB/s per disk (1782 MB/s total)

=== IcePod 6.5 ===
Tested with 4 256 GB SSD Drives

'''Read (5 reads, 2 threads, 100GB size)'''
258.21 MB/s per disk (1032 MB/s total)
'''Write (5 writes, 2 threads, 100GB size)'''
236.87 MB/s per disk (947 MB/s total)

=== ICE Briefcase ===
Tested with 8 512GB SSD Drives

'''Read (10 reads, 2 threads, 100GB size)'''
227.89 MB/s per disk (1823 MB/s total)
'''Write (6 writes, 2 threads, 100GB size)'''
244.98 MB/s per disk (1959 MB/s total)

[[Category:Index_pages]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:30, 13 May 2020
Line 30:		Line 30:
	244.98 MB/s per disk (1959 MB/s total)		244.98 MB/s per disk (1959 MB/s total)

−	[[Category:~~Index_pages~~]]	+	[[Category:Software]]

IceFS - Revision history

Wikiadmin at 20:30, 13 May 2020

Wikiadmin: Created page with "{{Gotoparent|Software}} ICE's proprietary file system, IceFS, was developed to exceed demanding data acquisition rates. Traditional file systems such as EXT and FAT did not me..."